Some Thoughts on Climate Change Denial

by Fred Kay
(North Vancouver BC Canada)

Thanks Laurent for the invitation to submit some further thoughts to your site.

The fight to restore our precious blue dot
to health and in particular to get our greenhouse gas emissions under control is the challenge which trumps all others in these troubled times.

In our entire history as a species we have never before faced a truly global threat to our existence. Even all out thermonuclear warfare pales in comparison to the worst-case scenarios that we now face and the mounting evidence
that they may well come to pass.

Might we get lucky once again and dodge the bullet? Will we be able to outwit capricious nature with our technological wizardry when the do-or-die moment is at hand? Will the geo-engineering boys ride to our rescue?

Regardless of where you might stand on technological salvation issues, the precautionary principle should be the order of the day.

Is this a chance we should really be gambling all our hopes on, especially given our track record?
Judging by the level of complacency, cognitive dissonance or whatever you choose to call it that is so prevalent in our daily lives, you've got to wonder if our survival instincts have not been fatally compromised this time around. Or at the very least our priorities badly out of sync with reality.

I just read an article in the paper the other day about the financial crisis in Italy and the extraordinary degree to which denial holds sway over the population. An analogy was made to the passengers on the Titanic who continued to dance as if nothing was amiss right up until the order was given to abandon ship.

And here we all are, passengers on our global Titanic, or to evoke an even more chilling analogy, passengers on the night train to Auschwitz, secure in our delusion that lady luck will intercede on our behalf if only we can suspend those nagging doubts a while longer.

There's always tomorrow, isn't there?

That moment we so desperately need, the Churchillian call to arms, is being cynically denied us by our political and corporate masters
in an act of such craven and self-serving cowardice that it staggers the imagination. We are expected to rally around the promise of
jobs and economic growth at the expense of our planetary life-support and not ask any embarrassing questions such as why any
of that would matter on a dying planet anyway.

Make no mistake we are being deliberately massaged into a state of somnambulance every day by the deniers for whom nothing is
sacred but power and profits. This should legally be considered a crime of genocide because that is precisely what it is. Those who
advocate and practise denial of the overwhelming scientific evidence of anthropogenic climate change already have blood on their hands
with millions, maybe billions to follow if we do not act to stop this travesty. If ever we are to moved to action, now is the time.

I ask anyone who reads this to seriously consider the possibility of contributing your support to making climate change denial the crime it deserves to be. And to make ecocide a crime as well.

Together we can ensure that the deniers can no longer hide in the shadows and continue to poison our collective well water with impunity. Support the movement for climate justice in your community while you still can.

Here's to our future, our children's future and all the generations to follow. It is only ours if we act to protect it.

Fred Kay
AlternativeBuilder.com

Comments for Some Thoughts on Climate Change Denial

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Apr 22, 2012
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Is it denial?
by: Paul. B.

I am a sceptic mainly because I am a layman and can only rely on selective scientific proofs in favour of it. Whilst the main article above is well written; much detail is incorporated from other sources of pollution (a deep worry) which are not akin to climate change.

Fact, what is CO2?, It most certainly is not a pollutant but a very necessary though small in contribution to plant growth and vegetation sustainability. To say it is better stored in wood is a contradiction as wood is a recyclable product of nature. To say too much is destroyed in favour of other human ventures is a reality and truth; we do need balance.

Climate change is an integral part of the existence of the blue dot and the breath of nature. Seek out any aboriginal/Indian history and they will teach you how to live with nature, however you cannot stop progress in the evolution of mankind and discovery of the universe. Balance will always be found once you limit the power of greed.

The biggest concern, particularly here in Australia is the governments attempts to tax something that is natural and that is natural gas recycling which has been isolated to CO2. Why? Because this is not the sole reason for climate change when CO2 is a fertilizer. The biggest cause for concern and not being mentioned is the reduction of and to alarming proportions the most precious gas on earth and that is Oxygen. The fact that CO2 is rising is not the fault of industry as a whole but what man has done to the planet. A tax on industry is not the answer as industry is doing what is needed to change in order to reduce CO2 emissions and all other pollutants that go with it and is a natural evolution of mankind and technology.

I for one have advocated for many years that all farming through out the world should reduce vast plateaus of corn to 1000 acre squares and every square should be surrounded with at least a minimum 10 meter width of vegetation/tree lines. Yes it cuts down on production yields, but today we yield more per acre than we did 25/30 years ago.

Mar 21, 2012
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
AGW deniers are nothing but greedy punks
by: Jim C.

Well put. When you REALLY think about the evidence and don't dismiss it for ideological reasons (as Creationists dismiss transitional fossils) it's clear that it takes a criminal attitude to ignore global warming scenarios. It's a fuzzy area of law where you can't technically call them criminals but intrinsically know they are.

Most AGW denial is coming from the same people who historically applied words like "hoax" or "scam" to acid rain, the ozone hole and a litany of other man-made environmental problems. They don't respect nature, and subsequently don't respect the source of their very own life. If that's not a form of criminal evil, what is? You can't call it a "lack of education" for many of them. They just don't care.

I ask every denier I meet these types of related questions:

"What causes photo-chemical SMOG over so many cities? Do you think Man is innocent of those charges, also? How is SMOG, which often originates from visibly transparent tailpipe emissions, any different (conceptually) than invisible CO2 pollution?"

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to How to Help.


Return to Top of Page  

Like This Page?



Recent Articles

  1. Interview With Jonah Bryson: "If we fail to protect the environment, nothing else matters"

    Nov 07, 16 12:21 AM

    We had the chance to speak with Film Director, Musician and Conservationist Jonah Bryson during TIFF 2016. Bryson has directed “The Fight For Bala”, a

    Read More

  2. Climate is Back

    Nov 07, 16 12:19 AM

    As I engage relentlessly in the fight to mobilize a complacent public and encourage reluctant politicians to focus on climate change action, I’ve come

    Read More

  3. Politicians Need to Break Free From Fossil Fuels

    Nov 06, 16 11:39 PM

    It’s time to break free from fossil fuels! It’s not time to promote pipelines and expand tar sands production in an attempt to create short-term jobs.

    Read More

  4. The Tides They Are A Changin'

    Nov 06, 16 11:18 PM

    We are really screwing up the Earth, and not having another one handy we need to get the message out to change our ways before it's too late. We cannot

    Read More

  5. Dying for Your Planet

    Oct 30, 16 02:51 PM

    Have you ever thought about what you value so much that you'd be willing to die for? What immediately comes to my mind is that I would do anything to keep

    Read More





Alternative Energy

Causes

Effects

Evidence

Facts

FAQ

Glossary

History

How to Help

Quotes

Important News

Sign a Petition!